Advice for those assigning or supervising court-ordered community service


The page you are reading now is a resource is for judges, probation officers, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and other criminal justice practitioners that are involved in assigning and supervising court-ordered community service. But programs that are expected to host these "volunteers" may also find it helpful.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3563(b)(12), courts in the USA may provide that the defendant “work in community service as directed by the court.”

Mandatory community service or a "Court Referral Program" is an alternate sentencing option for Superior, Municipal, Traffic and Juvenile Courts in the USA. Community service is considered restitution by an offender through helping his or her community, through a volunteering (unpaid work) experience with a nonprofit, government program and, sometimes, a religious organization. The service means actions, activity, engagement -- doing something that needs to be done and that helps a community or a cause.

According to Probation and Pretrial Services - Supervision, a section on a web site maintained by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on behalf of the Federal Judiciary, the benefits of this kind of community service are supposed to be that it

We'll touch on that idea of "free labor" (which it's not) later on this page.

The aforementioned US federal web site also has a section called Chapter 3: Community Service (Probation and Supervised Release Conditions) that says:

Community service is a versatile condition that can serve multiple purposes. It can, for example, serve as the publicly discernible penalty in probation cases or as a negative consequence for noncompliance with conditions of supervision, as a controlling strategy that requires defendants to be productively occupied, or as a correctional strategy that provides a way for defendants to acquire job readiness skills and job experience or broaden their network of associates in a more productive direction. In addition to the specific sentencing purpose to be served, the desired by-product of community service is always to benefit the community.

Too often, none of these goals are happening via court-ordered community service. Here's why:

Let's change that!

Why I care

I research volunteer engagement practices and volunteering, with an eye to what the best practices are for nonprofits, government programs and others to engage volunteers, I write and do trainings on what I learn, I am usually working with a nonprofit in a role where I am recruiting and supporting volunteers myself, and I am a volunteer myself.

I want better experiences for both those that engage in community service and those (nonprofits, community programs, etc.) that are expected to accommodate people who are assigned community service. I would like for people to have an experience that prompts them to keep being involved in nonprofits as nonprofits.

Courts officers must learn why nonprofits involve volunteers

Staff members at most nonprofits are NOT sitting around saying, "We have all this work to do and if some people would just show up, with no skills, no training, just a little time and good will in their hearts, we could get it all done." That's not why most nonprofits involve volunteers, especially since volunteers are not free: the staff at a volunteer hosting organization need to create volunteering opportunities, to supervise and support volunteers, to trouble-shoot and to evaluate and report on the experience.

If you ask an agency to create volunteering opportunities specifically for your court-ordered community service folks, you are asking them to spend money and resources they may not be able to afford, and they may not have roles and tasks that just anybody, no matter their skills and experience, can do. Nonprofits, charities, schools and other organizations, more often-than not, need volunteers with specific skills, experience and availability. And most of these programs have a priority to their clients and the services they provide, rather than a priority to accommodate absolutely anyone who needs community service hours.

In short, nonprofits and other groups are limited by budget and expertise in terms of who they can involve as volunteers. Many organizations, like Habitat for Humanity, often have more people wanting to volunteer than they have opportunities, and therefore have to turn a lot of people away.

Here's more about why programs involve volunteers.

The godmother of training about volunteer engagement, Susan Ellis, wrote an excellent piece called Court-Ordered Community Service: Volunteers or Prison Labor? that does a great job of exploring the involvement of court-ordered community service "volunteers" from the perspective of the organizations expected to involve such.

Courts must have better communication with those assigned community service

Courts, probation officers and others MUST do a better job of communicating with those who are assigned community service about what their options and how to approach organizations about volunteering.

For instance, those assigned community service need to be told, more than once, that organizations need plenty of lead time before they involve an applicant: rare is the organization that can get an email at 8 a.m. from someone wanting to volunteer and be able to accommodate that person that same day.

Those assigned community service need to be told that they may need to volunteer at multiple nonprofits in order to get all of the hours needed within a given time frame.

You also need to warn them about community service scams, where the person assigned community service pays money to a shady nonprofit that then gives that person a letter saying he or she completed a certain number of volunteering hours, though no volunteering is done: instead, the person might be asked to watch some videos or to fundraise among their friends on behalf of the nonprofit. Create a policy that your community service folks may NOT, under ANY circumstances, fundraise or pay to volunteer in order to fulfill their community service obligation, no exceptions. Paying a fee as a part of a volunteering program is automatically bad, as this blog details, but it's just too hard for court officers to figure out what's legitimate and what's not.

You need to give those you assign community service guidance on how to contact a nonprofit in order to volunteer, and you need to do it more than once. For instance, tell them all of the following, both in a document and in a video you prepare:

Those assigned community service should know that they could create their own experience at a nonprofit, if they can find a nonprofit to accommodate them: a web designer could help the local historical society create a better web site. A person with the right skills could edit raw videos a nonprofit has into an appealing presentation for that nonprofit's YouTube channel. A person who knows how to correct YouTube automatic closed captioning could contact nonprofits with lots of YouTube videos and offer to correct those transcriptions.

Your list of opportunities needs to be updated and regularly re-verified

If your court program hands out a list of programs you want to recommend to offenders for completing community service, you need to contact those programs at least once a year to make sure they are, indeed, still accepting court-ordered folks as volunteers. Programs change, staff members change, priorities change - you probably won't hear that a program is no longer accepting court-ordered folks as volunteers unless you ask.

Here are some groups you might want to add to your list:

Also, tell them to look for opportunities by looking for:
Here is even more detailed advice on finding volunteering opportunities, including opportunities with seniors/elders and opportunities for using business skills specifically.

Virtual volunteering is real volunteering

As noted earlier on this page, there are community service scams where the person assigned community service pays money to a shady nonprofit that then gives that person a letter saying he or she completed a certain number of volunteering hours, though no volunteering is done: instead, the person might be asked to watch some videos or to fundraise among their friends on behalf of the nonprofit. Some of these scams brand themselves as virtual volunteering. They are NOT, because the person, in fact, does not do any actual volunteering.

But virtual volunteering IS real volunteering. It's an established, credible practice with a history of more than 35 years. Online volunteers help nonprofits by transcribing their videos and podcasts for people with hearing impairments, researching topics online, translating text from one language to another, making web pages accessible for people with disabilities, mentoring young people and so, so much more.

One of the most readily available online volunteering opportunities is transcribing scans of historical documents - letters, speeches, newspaper stories, newspaper advertisements and more. By transcribing these documents, online volunteers, the documents become more searchable for researchers and more accessible to everyone. Through these programs, online volunteers are helping to amplify and preserve the stories of escaped enslaved people, the thoughts of and to people like Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, people who attended political meetings held at the state and national levels in the 1800s to free enslaved people or gain women the vote, and on and on. I have a list of every online transcription project for online volunteers that I know about at this resource on finding virtual volunteering roles and activities.

And the reality is that many people assigned community service struggle to get those hours completed because of their work schedule or child-care obligations. It's the 21st century: it's overdue for courts to allow online community service.

I've involved court-ordered community service people as online volunteers. They went through the same volunteer application process as any potential volunteer, including saying what skills they had, their availability, etc. About half of the people who applied disappeared as soon as they got the list of requirements: watching an orientation video, answering some followup questions, checking in every week, etc. - they realized this was real volunteering, requiring real work, and so they didn't follow through. But those who did go through the process were just as good as most other volunteers: one guy researched a particular subject for me, making a list of organizations and their web sites that were focused on a specific topic, which I used to make a web site. Another one populated a database for me with data I needed. Another one created interactive forms I needed and didn't know how to do it myself. I was happy to write a letter for each of them to their court officer, saying what they did as a volunteer and how many hours they completed (which was always more than they needed for the court).

How can a court verify the hours a person spends doing virtual volunteering? For instance, for participation in online historical transcription projects:

Give the volunteer one to two hours of credit for service hours JUST for setting up and maintaining the Google Doc and the Flickr account correctly.

As volunteerism expert Susan Ellis frequently pointed out, there are very few onsite, traditional volunteering activities where a volunteer is supervised the entire time he or she is performing service. Instead, the volunteers is trained, then given a desk, or a work space and materials, or a phone, or a garbage bag and some gloves, and then they do MOST of their volunteering largely unsupervised. As someone who has been fooled more than a few times by a volunteer sitting at a desk, looking at a computer screen for hours, and pretending to work – and after a day or two, I find out nothing is getting done – I’ve realized that volunteer supervision is much more than eyes-on-the-volunteer, or sign-in sheets at the door.

Could a volunteer fake all this record-keeping? Yes, and it would take that volunteer about as many hours to create the fake documents, screenshots and summaries as it would for them to do the ACTUAL volunteering and record-keeping – meaning they would still have had to do all this time to fulfill community service hours, even if they didn’t end up doing what they said they were doing.

Could someone else do all of this online service for the person? Yes: a parent, a sibling, a friend, or someone the person pays could do all of this. And this happens in onsite, in-person volunteering. People also frequently show up to volunteer at a beach clean up as community service, sign in, go sit in their cars and smoke or listen to music, then come back at the end and get their paperwork signed off that they did the hours. It’s the chance every program takes in not supervising people doing community service every moment. While Lindsay Lohan probably had her assistant do her online community service, I don’t think most people do.

Doesn’t allowing people to do their community service via online volunteering this create a lot of followup by the assigning body? Yes. And if I may be blunt, you all have never done well in this department with onsite, face-to-face folks – I’ve seen the forged paperwork first-hand for nonprofits that don’t exist or for nonprofits that have never seen or heard of the person that supposedly did the service. Let this be your opportunity to up your game in terms of confirming court-ordered community service completion.

You need to help people frame volunteering experience on their résumés

Your own program materials say that assigning community service can give the offender an opportunity to get work experience, job skills, and references. But how much guidance do you give them in this regard? Do you tell them how to note a volunteering role on their résumé? Do you tell them HOW volunteering should be framed so that an employer would see the experience as an asset for an employee to have? Do you tell them how to ask someone at a nonprofit to be a professional reference? 

Also see

 
  Discuss this web page, or comment on it, here.


  Quick Links 

 my home page
 
 my consulting services  &  my workshops & presentations
 
 my credentials & expertise
 
 My book: The Last Virtual Volunteering Guidebook

 contact me   or   see my schedule
 
 Free Resources: Community Outreach, With & Without Tech

 Free Resources: On Community Engagement, Volunteering & Volunteerism

 Free Resources: Technology Tips for Non-Techies

 Free Resources: Nonprofit, NGO & other mission-based management resources

 Free Resources: Web Development, Maintenance, Marketing for non-Web designers

 Free Resources: Corporate philanthropy / social responsibility programs

 Free Resources: For people & groups that want to volunteer
 
 linking to or from my web site
 
 The Coyote Helps Foundation
 
 me on social media (follow me, like me, put me in a circle, subscribe to my newsletter)

support my workhow to support my work

To know when I have developed a new resource related to the above subjects, found a great resource by someone else, published a new blog or a new Tech4Impact email newsletter, uploaded a new video,
or to when & where I'm training or presenting, use any of the following social media apps to follow me on any of these social media platforms:

like me on Facebook      follow me on Twitter    Mastodon logo    follow me on Reddit    follow me on LinkedIn     view my YouTube videos


Disclaimer: No guarantee of accuracy or suitability is made by the poster/distributor of the materials on this web site.
This material is provided as is, with no expressed or implied warranty or liability.

See my web site's privacy policy.

Permission is granted to copy, present and/or distribute a limited amount of material from my web site without charge if the information is kept intact and without alteration, and is credited to:

Jayne Cravens & Coyote Communications,
          www.coyotebroad.com

Otherwise, please contact me for permission to reprint, present or distribute these materials (for instance, in a class or book or online event for which you intend to charge).

The art work and material on this site was created and is copyrighted 1996-2023
by Jayne Cravens, all rights reserved
(unless noted otherwise, or the art comes from a link to another web site).